AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN LIMBAH BERBASIS MULAT SARIRA
Abstract
Abstrak: Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Limbah Berbasis Mulat Sarira. Penelitian ini mencoba untuk menggali makna mulat sarira dalam konsep akuntabilitas pengelolaan limbah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa konsep akuntabilitas berbasis mulat sarira pengelolaan limbah memberikan nilai puputan, THK, jengah, taksu, desa-kala-patra, saput poleng, ngayah, hukum karmaphala, dan paras paros. Mulat sarira sebagai senjata pengendalian diri mampu membangkitkan kewaspadaan diri untuk tidak merusak hubungan dengan Tuhan, manusia, dan lingkungan. Dengan demikian, budaya mulat sarira merupakan konsensus dekonstruksi nilai keseimbangan dan keharmonisan yang melandasi pembangunan konsep akuntabilitas pengelolaan limbah.
Abstract: Mulat Sarira-based Accountability Waste Management. This research tried to explore the meaning of mulat sarira in the concept of waste management accountability. The research method used was descriptive qualitative. This study found that the concept of accountability based on multifarious sarira gives the value of puputan, THK, embarrassment, taksu, village-kala-patra, polish, ngayah, karmaphala, and paros paros. Mulat sarira as a weapon of self-control could awaken self-awareness to not damage relationships with God, human, and environment. Thus, the culture of mulat sarira was the consensus of the deconstruction of balance and harmony values which underlies the development of the concept of waste management accountability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ananth, A. P., Prashanthini, V., & Visvanathan, C. (2010). Healthcare Waste Management in Asia. Waste Management, 30(1), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.07.018
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and Sustainable Development : An Exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395–413. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bovens, M. (2010). Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967. http://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486119
Byrch, C., Milne, M. J., Morgan, R., & Kearins, K. (2017). Seeds of Hope? Exploring Business Actors’ Diverse Understandings of Sustainable Development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 928–963. http://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2016-0438
Chaerul, M., Tanaka, M., & Shekdar, A. V. (2008). A system dynamics approach for hospital waste management. Waste Management, 28(2), 442–449. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.007
Dillard, J., & Roslender, R. (2011). Taking Pluralism Seriously: Embedded Moralities in Management Accounting and Control Systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(2), 135–147. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.014
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Making Sense of Accountability: Conceptual Perspectives for Northern and Southern Nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(2), 191–212.
Fatwadi, Handajani, L., & Fitriah, N. (2016). Voluntary Report Berbasis Green Accounting. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 7(3), 364-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2016.12.7027
Gibbon, J. (2012). Understandings of Accountability: An Autoethnographic Account Using Metaphor. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(3), 201–212. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.12.005
Joannides, V. (2012). Accounterability and the Problematics of Accountability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(3), 244–257. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.12.008
Kurland, N. B. (2017). Accountability and the Public Benefit Corporation. Business Horizons, 60(4), 519–528. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.03.009
Lehman, G., & Kuruppu, S. C. (2017). A Framework for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. Accounting Forum, 41(3), 139–146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.07.001
Lozano, R. (2012). Towards Better Embedding Sustainability into Companies’ Systems: An Analysis of Voluntary Corporate Initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 14–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.060
Muchlis, S., & Sukirman, A. S. (2016). Implementasi Maqashid Syariah dalam Corporate Social Responsibility di PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 7(1), 120-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2016.04.7011
Nasir, M. (2012). Model Pengolahan Limbah Menuju Environmental Friendly Product. BENEFIT: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 16(1), 58–68.
Ossege, C. (2012). Accountability – Are We Better off Without It ? An Empirical Study on the Effects of Accountability on Public Managers' Work Behaviour. Public Management Review, 14(5), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.642567
Overduin, N., & Moore, M. L. (2017). Social License to Operate: Not a Proxy for Accountability in Water Governance. Geoforum, 85, 72–81. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.008
Parker, L. D. (2011). Twenty-one Years of Social and Environmental Accountability Research : A Coming of Age. Accounting Forum, 35(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2010.11.001
Parker, L. D. (2014). Corporate Social Accountability through Action: Contemporary Insights from British Industrial Pioneers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(8), 632–659. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.10.001
Patton, J. M. (1992). Accountability and Governmental Financial Reporting. Financial Accountability and Management, 8(3), 165-180. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.1992.tb00436.x
Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking About Government. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
Rismawati. (2015). Memaknai Program Corporate Social Responsibility: Suatu Kajian Proses Transformasi Sosial Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 6(2), 245-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.08.6020
Rodrigue, M. (2014). Contrasting Realities: Corporate Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder-released Information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(1), 119–149. http://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1305
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2010). Ethnomethodology and the Moral Accountability of Interaction: Navigating the Conceptual Terrain of “Face” and Face-work. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2147–2157. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.019
Sudiharti, S. (2012). Hubungan Pengetahuan dan Sikap dengan Perilaku Perawat dalam Pembuangan Sampah Medis di Rumah Sakit PKU Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 6(1), 49–59.
Sullivan, N. O., & Dwyer, B. O. (2009). Stakeholder Perspectives on a Financial Sector Legitimation Process: The Case of NGOs and the Equator Principles. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(4), 553–587. http://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910955443
Thomas, T. E., & Lamm, E. (2012). Legitimacy and Organizational Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 191–203. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1421-4
Toms, S., & Shepherd, A. (2017). Accounting and Social Conflict: Profit and Regulated Working Time in the British Industrial Revolution. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 49, 57-75. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.03.002
Tsakona, M., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Gidarakos, E. (2007). Hospital Waste Management and Toxicity Evaluation: A Case Study. Waste Management, 27(7), 912–920. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.04.019
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2017.12.7067
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.